Evaluation of the nutritional composition, in vitro degradation and fermentation potential of the huitlaoche (Ustilago maydis) collected in different locations in Chiapas
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

Huitlacoche
nutritional value
fermentation
sheep

How to Cite

Noyola Méndez, L., Albores Moreno, S., Mariaca Méndez, R., Ruan Soto , F., & Cano Contreras, E. (2026). Evaluation of the nutritional composition, in vitro degradation and fermentation potential of the huitlaoche (Ustilago maydis) collected in different locations in Chiapas: Corn smut in livestock. Revista Bio Ciencias. https://doi.org/10.15741/revbio.13.e2071

Métricas de PLUMX 

Abstract

The objective was to evaluate its chemical composition, in vitro digestibility and production of fermentative gases, in order to determine its viability as a supplement in sheep diets. Samples were collected in three locations in Chiapas: San Cristóbal de las Casas, Chamula and Playón La Gloria. Its content of dry matter (MS), crude protein (PC), crude fiber (FC), ethereal extract (EE), carbohydrates (C), ash (Cen) and energy value (EB), condensable tannins (TC) was analyzed and total phenols (FT); Additionally, the in vitro gas production technique was applied for variables such as total volume (Vt), fermentation rates (S), delay phase (L), DIVMS and fermented gas production index (IPEGF). The PC values ranged between 10.56 and 14.53 g/100g and those of C between 59.03 and 60.46 g/100g, for EB, TC and FT they ranged between 298.6–321.8 kcal, 42.60–67.46 g/100g and 217.21–308.61 g/100g, respectively. The Chamula huitlacoche presented the lowest gas production The Chamula huitlacoche presented the lowest gas production (107.7 mL) and highest digestibility (27.27%), while the San Cristóbal huitlacoche showed the highest volume (377.92 mL) and DIVMS (84.58%). It is concluded that huitlacoche has a nutritional profile that can be incorporated as a supplement in sheep feed, with potential benefits in digestive efficiency and sustainability.

https://doi.org/10.15741/revbio.13.e2071
PDF (Español (España))

References

Alayón-Gamboa, J. (2015). Ganadería de traspatio en la vida familiar. Ecofronteras, 19 (54), 6-9. ISSN 2007-4549. https://revistas.ecosur.mx/ecofronteras/index.php/eco/article/view/1578

Albores-Moreno, S., Alayón-Gamboa, J., Miranda-Romero, L, Jiménez-Ferrer, G., Ku-Vera, J., & Vargas-Villamil, L. (2018). Nutritional composition, in vitro degradation and potential fermentation of tree species grazed by ruminants in secondary vegetation (acahual) of deciduous forest. The Journal of Animal & Plant Sciences, 28 (5), 1263-1275. ISSN: 1018-7081. https://thejaps.org.pk/AbstractView.aspx?mid=2018-JAPS-506

Andrade-Rivero, E., Martínez-Campos, A., Castelán-Ortega, O., Ríos-Quezada, J., Pacheco-Ortega, Y., & Estrada-Flores, J. (2012). Producción de metano utilizando plantas taniferas como substrato en fermentación ruminal in vitro y efecto de extractos fenólicos en la microflora ruminal. Tropical and Subtropical Agroecosystems,15 (2), 301 – 312. https://www.revista.ccba.uady.mx/ojs/index.php/TSA/article/view/841

Association of Official Analytical Chemists [AOAC]. (2023). Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 22nd Edition. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/9780197610145.001.0001

Beas, R., Loarca, G., Gusmán, S., Rodríguez, M., Vasco, N., & Guevara, F. (2011). Potencial nutracéutico de componentes bioactivos presentes en huitlacoche de la zona centro de México. Revista mexicana de ciencias farmacéuticas, 42 (2). https://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1870-01952011000200006

Castañeda de León, V., Martínez-Carrera, D., Morales, P., Sobal, M., Gil, A., & Leal, H. (2016). El cuitlacoche, producto de la interacción Ustilago maydis- maíz, una aportación de México al mundo en el sistema agroalimentario microbiano. In Martínez-Carrera, D., & Ramírez-Ciencia, J. Tecnología e Innovación en el Sistema Agroalimentario de México. (pp.193-222). Ed. Colegio de Postgraduados-AMC- CONACYT-UPAEP-IMINAP. https://hongosmedicinalesytusalud-cb-hcfm.com/documentoinv/2016_Sobal%20&%20Mart%C3%ADnez-Carrera_Recursos%20gen%C3%A9ticos.pdf

Castillo-González, A., Burrola-Barraza, M., Domínguez-Viveros, J., & Chávez-Martínez, A. (2014). Rumen microorganisms and fermentation. Austral journal of veterinary sciences, 46, 349-361. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0301-732X2014000300003

Coronel, R., & Martínez, J. (1995). Efecto de la inoculación del hongo comestible Pleurotus ostreatus sobre el valor nutricional de la paja usada en la alimentación de rumiante. Tesis de Licenciatura. Departamento de Zootecnia. UACH. Chapingo, México. 111 pp. https://hdl.handle.net/20.500.14330/PER01000083418

The Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO]. (2022). Forest and farm facility. Annual Report. https://www.fao.org/fileadmin/user_upload/forest_farm_facility/Files/short_report_Final2b_medium.pdf

Getachew, G., Makkar, H., & Becker, K. (2000). Tannins in Tropical Browses: Effects on in vitro Microbial Fermentation and Microbial Protein Synthesis in Media Containing Different Amounts of Nitrogen. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 48(8), 3581-8. https://doi.org/10.1021/jf990740v

Giraldo, L., Gutiérrez, L., & Rúa, C. (2007). Comparación de dos técnicas in vitro e in situ para estimar la digestibilidad verdadera en varios forrajes tropicales. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 20, 269-279. doi:10.17533/udea.rccp.324150

Gónzalez-Yépez, R. (2018). Introducción a la Toxicología de alimentos: una perspectiva global. CATEDEA, 2, 37-55. https://revistas.uclave.org/index.php/catedea/article/view/903

Hoover, W., & Stokes, S. (1991). Balancing carbohydrates and proteins for optimum rumen microbial yield. Journal of Dairy Science, 74(10), 3630–3644. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(91)78553-6

The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [IPCC]. (2023) Sections. In: Climate Change 2023: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change [Core Writing Team, H. Lee and J. Romero (eds.)]. IPCC, Geneva, Switzerland, 35-115. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647

Juárez-Montiel, M., Ruiloba, S., Chávez-Camarillo, G., Hernández-Rodríguez, C., & Villa-Tanaca, L. (2011). Huitlacoche (corn smut), caused by the phytopathogenic fungus Ustilago maydis, as a functional food. Revista Iberoamericana de Micología, 28(2), 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.riam.2011.01.001

Makkar, H. (2003). Effects and Fate of Tannins in Ruminant Animals, Adaptation to Tannins, and Strategies to Overcome Detrimental Effects of Feeding Tannin-Rich Feeds. Small Ruminant Research, 49 (3), 241-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0921-4488(03)00142-1

Menke, K., & Steingass, H. (1988). Estimation of the energetic feed value obtained from chemical analysis and in vitro gas production using rumen fluid. Animal Research Development, 28, 7-55. https://www.scienceopen.com/document?vid=e1859372-e696-424a-85fb-d305b0b594bc

Monár-Barragán, P., Lagla-Chimba, G., & López-Tipán, S. (2019). Ustilago maydis como posible bioindicador de cultivos saludables de Zea mays. Boletín micológico, 34(2), 73-80. https://doi.org/10.22370/bolmicol.2019.34.2.1983

Montañez, O., Ortega, M., Cobos, M., Larqué, A., & García, J. (2004). Efecto de la alimentación con paja de trigo tratada con Pleurotus florida en la flora ruminal de ovinos. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 38 (3), 249-257. https://www.redalyc.org/pdf/1930/193017849005.pdf

Mariaca, R., Pérez, J., León, N., y López, A. (2007). La milpa tsotsil de los Altos de Chiapas y sus recursos genéticos. México: Universidad Intercultural de Chiapas (UNICH) y El Colegio de la Frontera Sur (ECOSUR). https://searchworks.stanford.edu/view/7826368

Mariaca, R. (2013). El huerto familiar y su incomparable riqueza. Ecofronteras, 47. https://revistas.ecosur.mx/ecofronteras/index.php/eco/article/view/752

Mariaca, R., Ruan-Soto, F., & Cano-Contreras, J. (2008). Conocimiento tradicional de Ustilago maydis en cuatro grupos mayenses del sureste de México. Etnobiología, 6 (1). https://revistaetnobiologia.mx/index.php/etno/article/view/225

Mueller-Harvey, I. (2006). Unravelling the conundrum of tannins in animal nutrition. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 86(13), 2010–2037. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.2577

Theodorou, M., Williams, B., Dhanoa, M., McAllan, A., & France, J. (1994). A simple gas production method using a pressure transducer to determine the fermentation kinetics of ruminant feeds. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 48(3–4),185–197. https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-8401(94)90171-6

Owens, F., Secrist, D., Hill, W., & Gill, D. (1998). Acidosis in cattle: A review. Journal of Animal Science, 76(1), 275–286. https://doi.org/10.2527/1998.761275x

Patra, A., & Saxena, J. (2011). Exploitation of dietary tannins to improve rumen metabolism. Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 91(1), 24–37. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.4152

Rodríguez-Flores, E., Cifuentes-Blanco, J., Arreguín-Espinosa, R., & Rodríguez-Bustamante, E. (2021). La inclusión del huitlacoche, plaga para algunos y alimento para otros, en la biodiversidad y la soberanía alimentaria de México. En: González Martínez, T.M., & Ávila Akerberg, V. (eds.) Biodiversidad y soberanías alimentarias en América Latina (pp. 61-71) ISBN 9781792328626, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Toluca. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/356070127_La_inclusion_del_huitlacoche_plaga_para_algunos_y_alimento_para_otros_en_la_biodiversidad_y_la_soberania_alimentaria_de_Mexico

Stern, M., Varga, G., Clark, J., Firkins, J., Huber, J., & Palmquist, D. (1994). Evaluation of chemical and physical properties of feeds that affect protein metabolism in the rumen. In symposium: metabolic relationship in supply of nutrients for milk protein synthesis. Journal of Dairy Science, 77, p.2762-2786. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/7814745/

Valdez-Morales, M., Barry, K., Fahey, G., Domínguez, J., González, E., Valverde, M., & Paredes-López, O. (2010a). Effect of maize genotype, developmental stage, and cooking process on the nutraceutical potential of huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis). Food Chemistry, 119, 689–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2009.07.015

Valdez-Morales, M., Espinosa-Alonso, L., Espinoza-Torres, L., Delgado-Vargas, F., & Medina-Godoy, S. (2010b). Phenolic content and antioxidant activity of Ustilago maydis strains and their effect on fatty acid composition of pork meat. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 58(16), 9117–9122. 10.1007/s11130-016-0572-3

Valverde, M., Paredes, O., Pataky, J., & Guevara-Lara, F. (1995). Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis) as a food source biology, composition and production. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, 35, 191-229. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408399509527699

Van Soest, P. (1994). Nutritional Ecology of the Ruminant (2nd ed.). Cornell University Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/10.7591/j.ctv5rf668

Villagrán, Z., Martínez-Reyes, M., Gómez-Rodríguez, H., Ríos-García, U., Montalvo-González, E., Ortiz-Basurto, R., Anaya-Esparza, L., & Pérez-Moreno, J. (2023). Huitlacoche (Ustilago maydis), an Iconic Mexican Fungal Resource: Biocultural Importance, Nutritional Content, Bioactive Compounds, and Potential Biotechnological Applications. Molecules, 28, (4415). https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules28114415

Zhang, J., Zheng, N., Shen, W., Zhao, S., & Wang, J. (2020). Synchrony Degree of Dietary Energy and Nitrogen Release Influences Microbial Community, Fermentation, and Protein Synthesis in a Rumen Simulation System. Microorganisms. 8(2), 231. https://doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms8020231

Licencia Creative Commons
Revista Bio Ciencias by Universidad Autónoma de Nayarit under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License.
Based on work of http://biociencias.uan.edu.mx/.
Further permits not covered by this licence can be found at http://editorial.uan.edu.mx/index.php/BIOCIENCIAS.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.